Hyperloop vs. Paris Agreement

When faced with a problem do we innovate or restrain?

Solving problems usually begins with restraint and grit. We draw on our Puritanical zeal: work longer, get up earlier, develop a new skill, cut back expenses, and no chocolate. Restraint is not just related to personal problems; it plays out on the global stage as well.

Problem: Climate Change. The Paris Agreement's core philosophy was restraint by cutting back emissions. Hundreds of countries came together and shook hands on polluting less. When the US recently walked away from the agreement, it was seen as a huge setback. A major country turning its back on future generations.

Problem: Climate Change. The Hyperloop's core philosophy was innovation. The hyperloop sends a vehicle hundreds of miles per hour in a vacuum sealed tube completely avoiding traffic, friction, and air resistance. Faster speeds, less pollution. Rumor has it that Elon Musk was frustrated with traffic one day and wondered how to completely avoid it. It's like having your cake and eating it too.

While innovating might not always be feasible -- we should create thought experiments of hyperlooping the problem. Innovative solutions to make our lives easier. World's information at your fingertips, movies at a flick of a button, and flying like the birds were not born out of restraint. Our efforts do not have to be as lofty- easier ways to lose weight, side hustles to increase income, and learning faster are a meaningful start.

When a problem comes up run a thought experiment: Can I hyperloop it?